Sunday, February 12, 2012

Is the Government violating our First Amendment?


When the founding fathers sat down to write the US Constitution, they instilled the idea of the church and state being separate. In fact the first amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” Today, many people, including myself, feel that President Obama and the US government is now violating our first constitutional right.

Until very recent, under Obama’s 2010 Healthcare law most employers were required to fully cover contraception in their workers' health plans, including the ever so scandalous ‘morning after pill’. This means that all private corporations and business, religious/Christian based or not, were going to be required to provide insurance that covers something that completely goes against their morals and conscience. The Catholic population was furious.

Obama, being the politician he is, announced last Friday that he was going to change the rule a little bit. Now instead of the religious employers, who object to the use of birth control, insurance companies are now responsible for covering the cost of contraceptives ‘free of charge.’ And guess what? The Catholics still don’t approve. Hours after Obama announced the so called compromise the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) rejected the plan. One representative of the USCCB stated that the compromise “continues to involve needless government intrusion in the internal governance of religious institutions, and to threaten government coercion of religious people and groups to violate their most deeply held convictions.”

So is the US government violating our first amendment? Yes, I believe so. The first amendment clearly states that Congress cannot prohibit the free exercise of religion. This health care mandate is forcing people to go against their morals, conscience, and faith. Employers and even insurance companies have the right to follow their own conscience just like everyone else. Also, if an employee is that upset that the company they are working doesn't offer contraceptives as part of their insurance plan, that employee has every right to leave and find a different job in the secular community. If they don’t want to find a new job that offers that kind of insurance, birth control does not cost that much per month and is a very affordable out of pocket expense.

In conclusion, all I have to say is good job Obama. That’s one way to rally the Christian voters in an election year. 

1 comment:

  1. I actually completely disagree with you. First of all, the Founding Fathers did not sit down and consider the amendments, such as the Bill of Rights, at the same time as they wrote the Constitution. Second of all, Obama seems to be trying to help the poor and unfortunate. Of course those who can't afford birth control or any more children should restrain from having sex, but they aren't. When you barely have enough for food to feed your family, you are not going to be able to afford the 'out of pocket' expense of birth control every month. Obama isn't trying to violate our first amendment rights in anyway. He is just trying to provide for those less fortunate and cut down on the number of hungry children. The first amendment also states that Congress shall not make a law respecting the establishment of religion. To me this says that when we make our laws, we cannot be bias for or against religion in anyway. Christians shouldn't be turned away from Obama from this because he isn't the one needing the contraceptives, he is just trying to help those who do.

    ReplyDelete